In a tense exchange that has fueled heated debates, U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds has fired back at a personal attack from his congressional colleague, Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, who questioned his marriage and accused him of “whitewashing” himself due to his interracial relationship.

The clash began when Crockett commented on Donalds’ past remarks about the Jim Crow era and his views on Black families’ struggles under racial segregation. She suggested that his marriage to a White woman, Erika Donalds, may have influenced his perspective, saying, “Is this because you don’t understand history or literally it’s because you married a White woman? And so you think that that whitewashed you?”

Her remarks were aimed at Donalds’ controversial comments, which some critics felt minimized the profound impact of Jim Crow laws on Black families. However, Crockett’s personal jab at his marriage quickly escalated the situation.

Rep. Byron Donalds calls on Florida to 'correct' Black history standards on  slavery

Byron Donalds’ Response: “Don’t Talk About My Wife”

On a recent appearance on the Joe Pags Show, a visibly frustrated Donalds made his feelings clear. “Here’s what I’m going to say first and foremost: don’t talk about my wife. Keep my wife out of this. It ain’t got nothing to do with her,” he stated, addressing Crockett’s inflammatory remarks. The tone of his response was firm, emphasizing that his family and his marriage were off-limits in political discourse.

His remarks came as a direct reaction to Crockett’s insinuations about the dynamics of his marriage. Donalds, who is also running for governor, expressed his dissatisfaction with how Crockett had dragged his wife into the political arena, adding that such comments went beyond the realm of respectful political disagreement.

A Deeper Allegation: Racism in the Democrat Party

But Donalds didn’t stop there. He broadened his attack, accusing the Democrat Party of harboring racism, specifically targeting Crockett’s views on mixed marriages. Donalds suggested that the party only accepts interracial relationships as long as the individuals involved align with left-wing politics. “They don’t have a problem when Kamala Harris is married to a White man or when Ketanji Brown Jackson is married to a White man, as long as they subscribe to the politics of the Democratic left. As long as you do that, everything is fine. But if you’re a conservative, but your spouse happens to be White or of another race, then all of a sudden it’s a problem,” he argued.

He further claimed that Crockett’s focus on his marriage demonstrated the “racism in the Democrat Party,” which, according to him, was a double standard that should be called out. “This is the racism that occurs in the Democrat Party. I’m sick of it, tired of the BS,” he concluded.

Byron Donalds uses primetime speech to stump for school choice - Live  Updates - POLITICO

Crockett’s Rising Celebrity and Donalds’ Challenge

Donalds also criticized Crockett’s newfound visibility within the Democratic Party, suggesting that she was “putting on a show” for her supporters to elevate her profile. He speculated that her increasing fame among the left was motivating her to act provocatively.

Turning the tables, Donalds challenged Crockett to engage in a more direct political conversation. “Find a show and we’ll have a good time along the way,” he quipped. “You’ll be defeated very quickly,” he added, insinuating that her public persona wouldn’t hold up in a more serious debate.

Jasmine Felicia Crockett | The Texas Tribune

The Fallout: A Divisive Clash

As expected, the remarks sparked fierce reactions from both sides of the political aisle. For some, Donalds’ response was seen as a firm defense of his family and an important rebuttal to what they viewed as an unfair and personal attack. On the other hand, some of Crockett’s supporters viewed the exchange as further evidence of Donalds’ discomfort with confrontations over race and politics.

This exchange comes at a critical time for both politicians, as Donalds continues his gubernatorial campaign and Crockett’s voice grows stronger on the national stage.

As the dust settles, the political implications of their exchange are still unfolding, but one thing is clear: the battle lines have been drawn, and the war over race, politics, and personal boundaries in public life is far from over.