In a surprising twist to the ongoing legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, a recent New York Times interview with Lively has ignited a firestorm of controversy. During the interview, Lively made a seemingly innocuous remark: “It wasn’t that bad.” This statement, in the context of her serious allegations against Baldoni, has raised eyebrows and fueled further debate.

Lively’s original complaint accused Baldoni of sexual harassment and creating a hostile work environment during the filming of their 2024 movie, It Ends With Us. She alleged that Baldoni engaged in inappropriate behavior, including showing her explicit content without consent and making unsolicited comments about her personal life. Additionally, Lively claimed that Baldoni and his associates orchestrated a smear campaign to damage her reputation after she reported the misconduct .

However, her recent comment in the New York Times interview has complicated the narrative. By downplaying the severity of her previous allegations, Lively’s statement has been interpreted by some as undermining the gravity of the situation. This has provided ammunition for Baldoni’s legal team, who argue that Lively’s claims are inconsistent and lack credibility.

In response to the interview, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, issued a statement expressing concern over Lively’s contradictory statements. He emphasized the importance of consistency in legal proceedings and suggested that Lively’s recent remarks could weaken her position in the ongoing lawsuit.

The public’s reaction to Lively’s comment has been mixed. Some supporters argue that her statement reflects a desire to move past the traumatic experience and not dwell on the past. Others believe that her comment indicates a lack of seriousness about the allegations, potentially damaging the credibility of her case.

As the legal proceedings continue, this new development adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious situation. The outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, and the implications of Lively’s recent statement will likely play a significant role in shaping public perception and the legal strategies of both parties.