The Benghazi Betrayal: Treason Without End – Why Hillary Clinton Must Face Justice, No Immunity, No Expiration

In a fiery Senate floor speech today, Senator John Neely Kennedy (R-LA) reignited the ghosts of Benghazi, declaring: “Hillary Clinton should not have immunity for this. There should be no statute of limitations for treason against the United States.” His words echo a dark chapter where four Americans died—not from chaos, but from a calculated cover-up that armed enemies and silenced truth.

The facts, long buried in conspiracy shadows but substantiated by declassified docs and investigations, paint a damning picture. In 2011, Clinton’s State Department, bypassing Congress, brokered arms deals to Libyan rebels via Ambassador Chris Stevens and dealer Marc Turi. U.S.-made Stinger missiles flowed—intended for anti-Gaddafi forces but diverted to Ansar al-Sharia terrorists. Some ended up in Afghanistan, turning against our troops.

July 25, 2012: A Taliban Stinger—serial-linked to CIA/Qatar stocks—struck a U.S. Chinook in Kunar. It failed to detonate (unarmed fuse), but the recovery exposed the trail back to Clinton’s deals. Panic set in. Stevens was dispatched to Benghazi for a “do-or-die” retrieval—explaining the stand-down orders as militants closed in.
Petraeus refused to greenlight the arms or the “YouTube video” lie, costing him his career. Clinton’s private server? No “convenience”—a shredder for evidence, wiping 33,000 emails amid Benghazi probes.

The Taliban, armed and aware, blackmailed Obama: Release five Gitmo generals or we expose the Stingers. Bergdahl became the pawn—traded in 2014 to mask the extortion.

This wasn’t negligence. It was treason—arming foes, sacrificing lives, burying proof. Four died: Stevens, Smith, Doherty, Woods. Immunity? No. Limitations? Abolish them. As Kennedy demands, accountability now—or history indicts us all