LOS ANGELES, CA – In a media landscape often criticized for treading lightly around powerful political figures, a recent broadcast featuring comedian Adam Carolla and journalist Megyn Kelly has shattered the quiet. The duo delivered a scorched-earth critique of California Governor Gavin Newsom, labeling him a “sociopath” and accusing him of engaging in a brazen attempt to rewrite the history of his administration’s conduct during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The segment, amplified by the Resist the Mainstream platform, has ignited a fresh wave of scrutiny regarding the governance of the Golden State, the exodus of its residents, and the alleged double standards practiced by its Democratic leadership.

The “Sociopath” Allegation

Adam Carolla, known for his no-nonsense commentary and long-time residency in Los Angeles, did not mince words when asked about Governor Newsom. Reflecting on an hour-and-a-half interview he previously conducted with the Governor, Carolla offered a chilling character assessment.

“This guy is a goddamn sociopath,” Carolla declared to a stunned Megyn Kelly. “I talked to him. I stared into the eye of the beast… and all he does is lie.”

Carolla’s fury stems largely from what he perceives as a complete disconnect between Newsom’s public policies and his private behavior. The comedian pointed to the infamous “French Laundry” incident as the definitive proof of this duplicity. At the height of the pandemic, when Californians were told to avoid gathering and restaurants were shuttered, Newsom was photographed dining at the ultra-exclusive French Laundry restaurant with a large group of lobbyists and friends—indoors and maskless.

“He didn’t believe [in the danger] for 10 minutes,” Carolla argued. “He was out eating… with 22 of his closest friends, arm-in-arm, banging elbows, no mask, eating indoors. The following week, he shut down outdoor dining based on zero science.”

Revisionist History: The Battle Over Lockdowns

A central theme of the Carolla-Kelly discussion was the accusation that Newsom and other high-profile Democrats are now attempting to “gaslight” the public regarding their role in the lockdowns.

In a clip played during the broadcast, Newsom is heard claiming that his administration favored “local control” and “localism,” suggesting that it was individual counties, not the state, that decided to keep schools and businesses closed.

“Absolutely not,” Kelly fired back. “Literally every word of that was a lie. Total revisionist history.”

Critics point out that the Newsom administration implemented a strict, color-coded tier system that dictated exactly when and how counties could reopen. This system effectively stripped local officials of their autonomy, forcing them to adhere to state-mandated metrics that kept many businesses and schools closed for over a year.

Carolla recounted the absurdity of the enforcement during that period, reminding viewers of the specific, often draconian measures taken by the state. “They arrested people for paddle boarding in the harbor. They shut down all the beach volleyball courts. Being outdoors, vitamin D, exercise, sunshine could have been the best thing for you… but no, he locked them all up in their apartments.”

The School Closure Scandal

Perhaps the most emotionally charged aspect of the critique involved the extended closure of California’s public schools. For nearly two years, millions of public school students were relegated to remote learning, a policy that resulted in historic learning losses, particularly among minority and low-income communities.

However, as Kelly noted, this restriction did not apply to the Governor’s own family.

“He sent his four kids to private school which was open,” the host of Resist the Mainstream pointed out. “So his kids got to go to school while he kept all the other kids… away from their teachers, away from in-person learning.”

This “rules for thee, but not for me” approach has become a lightning rod for criticism. The teachers’ unions, which heavily fund Democratic campaigns, were widely seen as the driving force behind the prolonged closures. Carolla argued that Newsom “bowed” to these unions at the expense of the state’s children, only to now claim that he pushed for schools to reopen.

Eric Swalwell and the “Open Main Street” Claim

The segment also took aim at Congressman Eric Swalwell, who recently appeared on a news program claiming that Democrats were the party trying to “open Main Street, open schools, open churches.”

Carolla reacted with disbelief, calling the statement “insane.”

“You’re the ones who locked everyone down and got everyone addicted to fentanyl and suicidal,” Carolla retorted, referencing the mental health crisis and drug epidemic that surged during the lockdown period.

The broadcast highlighted the aggressive stance California took against religious institutions, citing reports of federal investigators monitoring churches to ensure compliance with mask mandates and capacity limits. To now claim the party was fighting to keep them open, critics argue, is a falsehood of Orwellian proportions.

The “Malibu Voter” Problem

Beyond the politicians, Carolla reserved significant criticism for the voters themselves—specifically the wealthy liberals in enclaves like Santa Monica and Malibu. He argued that these voters consistently elect officials based on identity politics rather than competence, only to complain when their quality of life deteriorates.

He cited the election of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass over businessman Rick Caruso as a prime example.

“You think it’s more important to have a woman of color versus a qualified person… well, you asked for it, you got it. Now your house is on fire,” Carolla said.

He clarified that while race or gender should never disqualify a candidate, they should not be the primary qualifications. The hyper-fixation on “representation,” he argued, has led to a class of leaders who are ideologically driven but operationally incompetent, resulting in dirty streets, failing infrastructure, and rising crime.

A Warning for the Future

The discussion concluded with a look toward the future. With rumors swirling about Gavin Newsom’s potential presidential ambitions, Kelly and Carolla framed their critique as a warning to the rest of the country.

They argued that the “California model”—marked by high taxes, strict regulations, and a widening gap between the ruling class and the working class—is a failure that must not be exported to the federal level.

“If this guy were not running for office… there’s zero chance for him to be doing this revisionist history,” the host noted.

As California continues to grapple with a massive budget deficit and a population exodus, the “dirty secret” of its decline is becoming harder to hide. For Carolla and Kelly, the message is simple: Look at the record, not the rhetoric. The disconnect between what was done to Californians and what is now being said about it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of accountability in public office. The question remains whether voters will heed the warning or continue to support the architects of their own discontent.