A pivotal witness expected to testify in the federal case against music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has reportedly gone missing, leaving prosecutors scrambling just weeks before opening statements are set to begin on May 12. The woman, referred to in court documents as “Victim Three,” is described as critical to the government’s case — and her sudden disappearance is stirring widespread concern about the stability of one of the year’s most high-profile trials.

According to sources familiar with the investigation, the missing witness had initially agreed to testify under a pseudonym, similar to several other accusers involved in the case. However, in a dramatic turn, she allegedly waived that right and opted to reveal her identity during her upcoming testimony. Now, neither federal prosecutors nor her attorneys reportedly know her whereabouts.

A Disappearance That Raises Questions

Court insiders suggest that the woman had been subpoenaed, meaning she was legally obligated to appear in court. Her absence could deal a severe blow to the prosecution, which had reportedly planned to use her testimony during opening statements.

“For prosecutors, this is an enormous red flag,” said a former federal attorney not connected to the case. “If a key witness goes missing before trial, it not only impacts the strength of the case but could also raise questions about whether intimidation or foul play is involved.”

The situation remains fluid. Law enforcement agencies have not confirmed whether a missing person report has been filed, and officials close to the case have declined to provide details, citing an ongoing investigation.

Who Is Victim Three?

While her current whereabouts are unknown, multiple reports and lawsuit filings point to a woman believed to be Christina Cororum — known in Diddy’s circle as “KK.” Public records and social media posts suggest Cororum served as chief of staff at Combs Enterprises for years. In a 2021 Facebook post, Diddy himself described her as his “right hand,” praising her for keeping his personal and professional life running smoothly.

Allegations against Cororum have surfaced repeatedly in civil lawsuits connected to Combs. She has been accused of acting as an enabler in what several plaintiffs describe as a pattern of sexual abuse and assault involving the music executive. In one lawsuit, a former associate referred to Cororum as the “Ghislaine Maxwell to Diddy,” alleging that she not only facilitated encounters but also participated in cover-ups when incidents occurred.

Cororum has publicly denied these allegations. In a statement released earlier this year, she called the claims “false, upsetting, and unthinkable,” adding that she has “never condoned or aided any assault” and is confident that the allegations against her will be proven untrue.

Disturbing Allegations Surface

Court documents and media reports paint a troubling picture of events that allegedly took place behind closed doors. According to one plaintiff’s account, Cororum was present during a 2018 incident in which a woman claimed she was assaulted in a suburban home after being lured under false pretenses. The woman alleged that Diddy threatened her with a knife, physically assaulted her with a television remote, and then instructed others to attack her while he reportedly watched.

The plaintiff further claimed that Cororum remained at the scene throughout the ordeal, allegedly providing the victim with an unidentified pill afterward. Although the woman eventually escaped and filed a police report, no arrests were made at the time — a fact some legal analysts attribute to Combs’ influence and resources.

Additional lawsuits describe Cororum as a central figure in organizing what one accuser called “wild parties” involving drugs, alcohol, and non-consensual acts. These allegations, which Diddy and Cororum have both denied, form part of the broader narrative prosecutors are expected to present at trial.

A Voice Note Adds Pressure

Complicating matters further, prosecutors are reportedly in possession of a voice note recently discovered by investigators. According to individuals briefed on the case, the recording was allegedly sent by a separate figure in the scandal — a woman named Ally Carter — to a close friend just days before trial preparations intensified.

Carter, who has publicly accused Combs of orchestrating violent attacks and intimidation efforts, claimed in previous social media posts that her home was “ransacked” and that she feared for her life. She also alleged that her personal information had been leaked, making her a target.

While officials have not commented on the contents of the voice note, legal experts suggest it could play a significant role in determining whether additional charges are brought against Cororum or others connected to Combs.

Public Reaction and Lingering Fears

News of the missing witness has ignited a storm of speculation online. Supporters of the accusers are calling for immediate protective measures for all individuals linked to the case, while others are questioning whether authorities can guarantee a fair trial under such circumstances.

“This feels like a movie, but it’s real life,” one commenter wrote on social media. “If witnesses are disappearing, how are we supposed to trust that justice will be served?”

Another user expressed concern for the missing woman’s safety: “I just hope she’s alive and okay. No case is worth someone losing their life over.”

What Happens Next?

As jury selection moves forward, the absence of a key witness looms large over the proceedings. Legal observers note that while prior statements or depositions may still be admissible under certain conditions, the power of live testimony is difficult to replace.

“The credibility of a case often hinges on whether the jury hears directly from the victims,” said a veteran trial consultant. “Without that, the defense can argue there’s reasonable doubt — and that’s what matters most in a criminal trial.”

For now, federal prosecutors remain tight-lipped, and the public is left to wonder: Where is Victim Three? And what does her disappearance mean for a trial that promises to expose the darkest corners of the entertainment industry?

As one legal analyst put it, “This case was already explosive. Now, it’s become something else entirely — a test not just of Diddy’s guilt or innocence, but of the justice system’s ability to protect those who come forward.”