The legal battle surrounding Blake Lively and her involvement in the It Ends With Us film has taken a dramatic turn, with the possibility of her contract being exposed in court. Here’s what we know about the case and what could be revealed if Blake’s employment agreement is unsealed.

What’s at Stake?

Blake Lively’s contract with Wayfair, the studio behind It Ends With Us, has become a point of contention in the ongoing lawsuit. The contract in question likely includes several critical aspects, such as:

Base salary and bonuses: How much Blake was paid for her role, potentially differing from the publicly speculated $3 million.
Creative control: Whether Blake had any input in decisions like script revisions or final cuts.
Morality and confidentiality clauses: These clauses would prevent Blake from speaking negatively about the studio, directors, or co-stars. If she breached these terms, it could seriously harm her case.
Publicity commitments: Whether Blake was contractually obligated to do press tours or social media posts promoting the film, and if she failed to meet those obligations.

Key Clauses to Watch

The most significant aspects of Blake’s contract that could be exposed include:

Morality Clause: This would allow Wayfair to terminate her involvement in the film if her actions or public statements caused harm to the film’s reputation. If Blake disparaged the studio or made misleading public statements, this could be a breach of the contract.
Non-disparagement Clause: If Blake is bound by a non-disparagement agreement, leaking details or speaking poorly about the film or the production could damage her case. The court could use this to argue that her actions led to negative publicity that harmed the film’s success.
Termination Clauses: If Blake was acting outside the bounds of her contract—such as refusing press duties or speaking publicly about the project—this could lead to termination and possibly a clawback of the fees paid to her.

The Public Fallout

If these clauses are exposed, it could show that Blake’s behavior during the film’s promotion was not only damaging but potentially in violation of her contract. Wayfair may argue that Blake’s emotional distress claims are a result of her own actions, which breached the contract rather than any misconduct on the studio’s part. This would severely undermine her lawsuit.

What’s Next?

The Unsealing: The judge has yet to release the full details of Blake’s contract, but Wayfair has made moves to withdraw the request to keep it sealed, meaning that the public will soon get access to the document. This could have major implications for her legal standing.
Blake’s Role: If Blake signed on as an executive producer, she would have had significant control over the project, making it difficult for her to argue that she was a passive participant. This could make her claims of being a victim of the production’s failings much harder to defend.

Public Perception

This entire saga underscores the fragility of celebrity relationships and the unpredictable nature of legal disputes in Hollywood. If the contents of Blake’s contract are revealed, the public could see a much more complicated picture of her involvement in the film. It may also damage her public image if it shows that she was in a position of power, but still created controversy and damage to the film’s reputation.

In the end, Blake Lively’s legal battle could have significant consequences, both for her career and the broader Hollywood system. Fans and critics alike are watching closely to see what will be revealed next.